Economies & Governance
Building crypto-native economic and governance infrastructure to create more efficient, equitable structures that coordinate at the scale of nation-states.
This focus area rectifies the inadequacies of current macro systems, which often struggle to coordinate and solve monumental challenges like climate change. By leveraging cryptoeconomics and improved governance tools, we are rethinking how capital is formed and deployed.
This movement harnesses mechanism design to align millions of people worldwide toward shared goals, creating structures that can allocate resources at the scale of nation-states for the benefit of all humanity.
Explore
Subareas
9 interconnected subfields driving systemic change.
Opportunity Spaces
4 convergence zones for systemic change.
Impact Dashboard
Ecosystem impact across villages and funding.
Project Explorer
242+ teams building public goods infrastructure.
Dependency Graph
Strategic dependency trees across 4 inflection points.
Grants
FA2 · Economies & Governance
The Funding Pipeline
A staged capital architecture — from early-stage research primitives through sovereign deployments to blended investment at scale.
Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
AI & Crypto-Native PGF at Nation-Scale
Crypto-Native Governance & Democracy
Decentralized Climate Infrastructure & Finance
Academic Research Paper
XYZ
XYZ
Country Track
Direct Investment
Note
Stage amounts are indicative. Actual grant sizes depend on scope, partner co-funding, and available capital. RetroPGF stages are subject to retroactive evaluation criteria set by the respective partner.
How to Engage
We are actively seeking:
Feedback on this framing
Does this opportunity space resonate? What's missing? What's wrong?
Case studies and examples
What sovereign DPI deployments, DeSci infrastructure, DePIN projects, or PGF mechanisms should we be learning from?
Partner identification
Who else should be at the table? What institutions, teams, or individuals are essential to this work?
Technical input
What reference architectures, standards, or specifications would be most valuable?
Strategic counsel
What have we gotten wrong about the field, the opportunity, or the approach?